In response to yet another Jennifer Rubin hit piece on Sen. Rand Paul

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/04/06/rand-pauls-unfortunate-timing/

Don't you have something better to do than write articles all day bashing on Rand Paul? Why don't you spend your time bashing Hillary Clinton? Or why not be a respectable journalist and break stories that actually mean something to the world? They must pay you a lot to continue churning out this garbage propaganda slander clickbait with such consistency.

Here's my article about you and your writing:

Jennifer Rubin is a middle-aged blogger whose self-important "writing" on the current state of political affairs is often biased by her washed-up neoconservative views. She is just another overzealous Republican with a not-so-secret desire to bomb the Middle East and she will attack any Republican who doesn't share her wishes. Although as a young adult she hoped she would become a meaningful journalist someday that would break stories and write compelling political op-ed's backed up by facts, she has instead become just another Republican propagandist that spews out hate on a daily basis and almost always relies on her personal feelings about a candidate instead of facts." I'd love to speak with you more about this and interview you for my blog and get to the bottom of what exactly it means to be a neoconservative shill.

This was originally posted as a comment to the story but the Washington Post censored my comment.

In regards to Lloyd Green's article Rand Paul's NYPD Shooting Blowback
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/22/the-biggest-loser-in-nypd-shooting-fallout-rand-paul.html

No matter where one stands on the Eric Garner, Michael Brown cases, the militarization of the police as well as the racial disparity of arrests should not be a partisan issue.  Two-thirds disagree with President Obama’s reaction to the Ferguson and New York City decisions?  What a surprise.  These days the Old Whig Republicans are more interested in rebuking Obama than actually being right.  And in regards to your "seven-in-[10] Republicans believe that the police treat blacks and whites equally", lets just say Republicans are not always factually correct: http://ago.mo.gov/VehicleStops/2013/reports/161.pdf.  Its no secret that Senator Paul has never been the most calculated, but I think even he knows that this is not a politically advantageous issue for him to stick his neck out for.  Seems to me that you are trying to count Rand Paul out before the process has even started...  Why aren't you writing articles about the inevitable failed campaigns of John Bolton, Michelle Bachmann, etc. (Super Tuesday is not looking great for them either.)  I applaud Rand Paul for speaking up on an issue where there's not an easy answer.